Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): Trabajo animal, trabajo humano
Dossier

O controle do risco na zooterapia: : cooperação, confiança e modelação do ser vivo em uma técnica de trabalho

pdf (Español (España))
  • Ivana dos Santos Teixeira
Ivana dos Santos Teixeira
Maria Pirene dos Santos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29112/ruae.v6i2.997

Published 2021-12-20

How to Cite

dos Santos Teixeira, I. (2021). O controle do risco na zooterapia: : cooperação, confiança e modelação do ser vivo em uma técnica de trabalho. Uruguayan Review of Anthropology and Ethnography On Line: ISSN 2393-6886, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29112/ruae.v6i2.997

Copyright (c) 2021 Ivana dos Santos Teixeira

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Zootherapy is a contemporary manifestation and it can be considered as a therapeutic technique in the Western medical system. Its recognition process as a professional activity has been marked by new rules and requirements and, among these, the control of risks that have been associated with this practice. Considering such actions, this work investigates the ways in which risk perception has mobilized zootherapy professionals, animals, and institutions, as well as addressing the professionalization of this type of intervention. We use an approach based on practice and objectification of the way of doing, with participant observation in different zootherapy associations. The analysis of the data was guided by the premises of the anthropology of the technique that sheds light on the actions involved in different processes of human life in dialogue with the environment. Through technically oriented knowledge, skills, and attitudes, those involved rationalize the dangers of their work routine by cultivating bodily and emotional dispositions that ensure the permanence of the technique in this universe.

pdf (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Canguilhem, G. (1951/1992). La connaissance de la vie. Paris: Vrin.
  2. Chandler, C. K. (2005). Animal Assisted therapy in counseling. 2.ª ed. New York: Routledge.
  3. Costa Neto, E. M. (1999). Barata é um santo remédio: introduçã o à zooterapia popular no estado da Bahia. Feira
  4. de Santana: uefs.
  5. Costa Neto, E. M. (2006). Os moluscos na zooterapia: medicina tradicional e importância clínicofarmacológica.
  6. Biotemas, 19(3), 7178.
  7. Disponível em <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/biotemas/article/
  8. view/21177/19158>.
  9. Descola, P. (2005). Pardelà
  10. nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.
  11. DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York: Columbia
  12. University Press.
  13. Dotti, J. (2005). Terapia e Animais. São Paulo: Noética.
  14. European Society for Animal Therapy (ESAAT) (2010). Principles for Animal-Assisted Work with Domestic
  15. Animals and Pets. Viena: esaat. Disponível em <https://www.en.esaat.org/fileadmin/_migrated/
  16. content_uploads/esaat_principles.pdf>.
  17. Ferret, C. (2006). Techniques iakoutes aux confins de la civilization altaïque du cheval. Contribution à une
  18. anthropologie de l’action (Thèse de doctorat en anthropologie sociale et ethnologie). ehess, París.
  19. Ferret, C. (2012). Vers une anthropologie de l’action. André-Georges Haudricourt et l’efficacité technique.
  20. L’Homme, 202, 113-140. https://doi.org/10.4000/lhomme.23041
  21. Fine, A. H. (2010). Handbook on Animal – Assisted Therapy. Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. 3.ª
  22. ed. Londres: Academic Press-Elsevier.
  23. Fuchs, H. (1987). O animal em casa: em estudo no sentido de des-velar o significado psicológico do animal de estimaçã o
  24. (Tese de doutorado). Instituto de Psicologia, Curso de Pós-Graduaçã o em Psicologia, usp. Disponível em
  25. <https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/47/47132/tde-27042018-151119/pt-br.php>.
  26. Grandgeorge, M.. e Hausberger, M. (2011). Humananimal relationships: from daily life to animal assisted
  27. therapies. Ann Istitute Super Sanità, 47(4), 397-408.
  28. Greimas, A. J., e Courtés, J. (1979). Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. París: Hachette.
  29. Haudricourt, A.-G. (1962). Domestication des animaux, culture des plantes et traitement d’autrui. L’Homme, 2(1),
  30. -50.
  31. Heredia, J. M. (2011). Etología animal, ontología y biopolítica en Jakob von Uexküll. Filosofia e História da Biologia,
  32. (1), 6986. Disponível em <http://www.abfhib.org/FHB/FHB-06-1/FHB-6-1-05.html>.
  33. Ingold, T. (1994). What is an animal? Londres: Routledge.
  34. Ingold, T. (1998). Humanidade e animalidade. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 28. Disponível em
  35. www.biolinguagem.com/inuma/INGOLD%201994%20humanidade%20e%20animalidade.pdf>.
  36. Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Londres: Routledge.
  37. Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A Brief History. Londres: Routledge.
  38. Lestel, D. (2004). L’Animal singulier. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  39. Levinson, B. (1969). Pet Oriented Child Psychotherapy. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, publisher.
  40. Matuszek, S. (2010). Animal facilitated Therapy in Various Patient Populations. Systematic Literature Review. Holist
  41. Nurs Pract, 24(4), 187-203. Disponível em <https://journals.lww.com/hnpjournal/fulltext/2010/07000/
  42. Animal_Facilitated_Therapy_in_Various_Patient.3.aspx>.
  43. Murthy, R., Bearman, G., Brown, S., Bryant, K., Chinn, R., Hewlett, A., … Weber, D. (2015). Animals in Healthcare
  44. Facilities: Recommendations to Minimize Potential Risks. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 36(5),