her Scientifics (and more than that): reflections on self-care, emotions, ethics, agency and power in feminist research
Published 2022-07-05
Keywords
- autocuidado,
- investigación feminista,
- agencia,
- ética,
- antropología
- self-care,
- feminist research,
- agency,
- ethics,
- anthropology
- autocuidado,
- pesquisa feminista,
- agencia,
- ética,
- antropologia
- autocuidado,
- pesquisa feminista,
- agencia,
- ética,
- antropologia
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrea Isabel Aguilar Ferro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In recent years, in academic contexts, both anthropological and feminist, we have sustained reflections on the need to carry out committed, situated and, in possible horizons, collaborative research. These reflections invite us to adopt pertinent and relevant ethical considerations with whom we do research. In this article I write from my experience as a feminist researcher and I present some examples with research that have led me to recognize the agency of the contexts in which we research and of the research itself, insofar as it produces experience in us, situates us and affects us in multiple dimensions, including our emotions. Especially derived from my experiences in collaborative research, I reflect on the mutability of the positions that we adopt as researchers but also as research subjects. I am talking about mutability of positions insofar as the experience that is produced from research is never and will never be static, neither for those who lead the processes, nor for those who collaborate in them. Our positions become more complex as they intertwine with our emotions and mutual affections that can come to mediate our experience with the research itself. In this sense, I also address the relevance of doing research with our circles, with our colleagues, friends, and peers, not only in academic contexts but also in activism. Finally, I reflect on the implications of positioning and situating ourselves in investigative experiences (collaborative or not), on the power dynamics that go through these experiences, and on the need to build self-care practices for researchers, starting from recognizing ourselves as sensitive beings.
Downloads
References
- Aguilar Ferro, A. I. (2015). Salud Pública y Medicina Tradicional: Una mirada a la experiencia maya del cáncer en Guatemala. Guatemala. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala.
- Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart. En Parallax, 20(3), 168-187. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
- Behar, R. (1996). The Vulnerable Observer. Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Boscacci, L. (2018). Wit(h)nessing. En Environmental Humanities, 10(1), 343-347. doi: 10.1215/22011919-4385617
- Braidotti, R. (2008). Affirmation, Pain and Empowerment. En Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(3), 7-36. doi: 10.1080/12259276.2008.11666049
- Buschmann, J., Homad-Hamam, G., Cabaña, G., & Murray, M. (2017). Manual de Antropología y Medios. Chile: Escuela de Antropología UC.
- Castañeda Salgado, M. P. (2008). Metodología de la Investigación Feminista. Guatemala. Fundación Guatemala.
- De la Cadena, M. (2017). Runakuna: humanos pero no solo. En Catálogo de la exposición Cale, cale, cale! Caale!!! realizada en Tabakalera Donostia. (pp. 221-235). España.
- DeVault, M. L. (1997). Personal Writing in Social Research: Issues of Production and Interpretation. En R. Hertz (Ed.), Reflexivity & Voice (pp. 217-228). Estados Unidos de América: SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Foucault, M. (1999). Estrategias de poder. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica, España.
- Gil, S. L. (2021). Pensamiento feminista contemporáneo. (Re)pensar la política en tiempos de crisis. En M. Menéndez Díaz & M. García (Eds.), La vida en el centro. Feminismo, reproducción y tramas comunitarias (p. 259). México: Bajo Tierra A.C.
- Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575. doi: 10.2307/3178066
- Hill Collins, P. (1993). Toward a New Vision: Race, Class, and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection. En Jean Ait Belkhir, Race, Gender & Class Journal, Vol. 1(No. 1 (Fall 1993), pp. 25-45.
- Hirsh, E., Olson, G. A., & Harding, S. (1995). Starting from Marginalized Lives: A Conversation with Sandra Harding. JAC, 15(2), 193-225. Recuperado de: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20866024
- Lorde, A. (1988). A Burst of Light: essays. Estados Unidos de América: Firebrand Books.
- Masson, L. (2017). Epistemología Rumiante. México-España: Pensaré Cartoneras.
- Moreno, E. (1995). Rape in the field. Reflections from a survivor. En D. Kulick & M. Willson (Eds.), Taboo. Sex, identity, and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork. (pp. 219-250). Reino Unido: Routledge.
- Mujeres AL BORDE, C. (2016). III Femzine AL BORDE: Autocuidado y sanación feminista para ingobernables. Colombia: Mujeres AL BORDE.
- Ramazanoğlu, C., y Holland, J. (2002). Feminist Methodology. Estados Unidos de América: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781849209144
- Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. Estados Unidos de América: Oxford University Press.
- Rivera Álvarez, L. N. (2006). Autocuidado y capacidad de agencia de autocuidado. En Avances en Enfermería, 24(2 SE-Artículo de investigación), 91-98. Recuperado de: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/avenferm/article/view/35969
- San Román Espinosa, T. (2006). ¿Acaso es evitable? El impacto de la Antropología en las relaciones e imágenes sociales. Revista de Antropología Social, 15, 373-410.
- Tarzibachi, E. (2017). Cosa de mujeres: menstruación, género y poder. Argentina: Sudamericana.
- Vega, C. (2021). Rutas de la reproducción y el cuidado por América Latina. Apropiación, valorización colectiva y política. En M. Menéndez Díaz & M. García (Eds.), La vida en el centro. Feminismo, reproducción y tramas comunitarias. México: Bajo Tierra A.C.