Homeland or fire. Discursive analysis of an Open Letter about fires on islands in the Paraná Delta (year 2020)
Published 2021-07-07
Keywords
- Ecología Política,
- Análisis del Discurso,
- Comunicación ambiental,
- Ethos,
- Movilizaciones socioambientales
- Political Ecology,
- Discourse Analysis,
- Environmental communication,
- Ethos,
- Socio-environmental mobilizations
- Ecologia Política,
- Análise do Discurso,
- Comunicação ambiental,
- Ethos,
- Mobilizações socioambientais
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Francisco Preiti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In this article we develop discursive analyzes positioned from perspectives of the French school
of discourse analysis (Amossy, 2016, 2017 and 2018; Maingueneau, 2010). We interpret a Corpus
of Analysis constructed around the social problems caused by fire in the Parana’s Delta that
mainly occupied the jurisdiction of the Province of Entre Ríos, Argentina, but which affected the
City of Rosario, causing the deployment of a large media enunciative mass, social mobilizations
and government interventions around the reference “fire on the islands.” We select and interpret
an “Open Letter to Mr. President Alberto Fernández” by which it was denounced the situation
of “burning on the islands” and was widely disseminated and supported through the change.
org platform and on it we apply a series of discourse analysis categories such as “controversial
discourse”, “counter-recipients” and “ethos”, part of Classical rhetoric taken up by the French
school. Finally, we open the discussion with the following questions: if the claim expressed
in the Open Letter invokes planning and governance over the territory, does this constitute a
political or police act (Rancière, 2000)? What other modes of democratic management can be
carried out in the face of this socio-environmental conflict?
Downloads
References
- Amossy, R. (2016). Por una retórica del dissensus. Las funciones de la polémica. En: El análisis del discurso polémico: disputas, querellas y controversias, compilado por A.S. Montero. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
- Amossy, R. (2017). Apología de la polémica. Ciudad Autónoma de Bs. As. 1° ed. Prometeo Libros,
- Amossy, R. (2018) La presentación de sí. Ethos e identidad verbal. Buenos Aires, Prometeo.
- Beltrán Costa, O. (2016) Antropología de la conservación. Balance y Perspectivas. Recuperado de: https://www.academia.edu/25838575/Antropolog%C3%ADa_de_la_Conservaci%C3%B3n_en_Espa%C3%B1a._Balance_y_perspectivas
- Cardón, D. (2016). La ampliación del espacio público. En: La democracia Internet. Promesas
- y límites. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
- Charaedeau, P. y Maingueneau, D. (2002). Diccionario de Análisis del Discurso. Madrid:
- Amorrortu Editores.
- Hardy-Short, D. C. y Brant Short, C. (1995). Fire, death, and rebirth: A metaphoric analysis
- of the 1988 Yellowstone fire debate, Western Journal of Communication. 59:2, 103-125,
- DOI: 10.1080/10570319509374511
- Maingueneau, D. (2010): El enunciador encarnado: La problemática del ethos. Versión 24: 203-225.
- Mouffe, C. (2016). Agonística. Pensar el mundo políticamente. Buenos Aires: FCE. (Capítulo 1).
- Rancière, J. (2000). Política, identificación y subjetivación. El reverso de la diferencia. Compilado por B. Arditi, 219-248. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.
- Swyngedouw, E. (2011). La Naturaleza no existe. La sostenibilidad como síntoma. Recuperado
- de: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3762434.pdf
- Verón, E. (1987). La palabra adversativa. Observaciones sobre la enunciación política. El discurso político. Lenguajes y acontecimientos. Coordinado por E. Verón et al. Buenos Aires: Hachette