PHILOSOPHY; HISTORY; POLITICS; CULTURAL STUDIES; LATIN AMERICA

v. 4 n. 2 (2020): Sección Estudios de la Cultura. Cine en América Latina: dinámicas de un intercambio histórico.
Dossier

Cidade de Deus, Babel, and También la lluvia. Towards a Global Film Language

PDF (Español (España))
  • Maude Havenne
Maude Havenne
Georgetown University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59999/4.2.1162

Publicado 2021-01-10

Como Citar

Havenne, M. (2021). Cidade de Deus, Babel, and También la lluvia. Towards a Global Film Language. Encuentros Latinoamericanos (segunda época), 4(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.59999/4.2.1162

Copyright (c) 2021 Maude Havenne

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Resumo

After decades of struggle against Western hegemony, the success of Third World cinema both from critics and at the box-office attests to a change in the center vs. periphery scheme of cinematic productions worldwide. The case of Ibero-American movies especially, with productions such as Cidade de Deus (Fernando Meirelles and Kátia Lund, 2003), Babel (Alejandro González Iñárritu, 2006) and También la lluvia (Icíar Bollaín, 2010) provides an alternative to David Bordwell’s confident statement in 1985 that “no absolute pure alternative to Hollywood exists” (Bordwell, 1985, p. 624). Building on recent film scholars’ paradigms of a post-classical and more global cinema (such as Deborah Shaw, 2007 and Eleftheria Thanouli, 2009), this essay offers a close-reading of these three contemporary Ibero-American movies in terms of their similarities from a production, distribution, as well as aesthetic perspective. Through an analysis of shared collaborative strategies and patterns of creation (narratives in “network”, preferences for multiple languages, shooting locations, and protagonists, etc.), the following article argues for a general intent both from Hispanic and Lusophone productions to fight alongside instead of against other cinematic currents in a joint effort to gather strength against multinational exploitation, inequality, exclusion, and other negative consequences of globalization.

PDF (Español (España))

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

  1. ADORNO, TH. and HORKNEIMER, M. (1993). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. In: Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum. Available at http://faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/Adorno-Horkheimer-Culture-Industry.pdf.
  2. ANDERSON, B. (2006). Imagined Communitites. New York: Verso.
  3. ANDREW, D. (2006). An Atlas of World Cinema. In S. DENNISON and S. HWEE (Eds.), Remapping World Cinema (pp. 19-29). New York: Columbia University Press.
  4. APPADURAI, A. (1990). Disjunction and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Public Culture, 2 (2), 1-24.
  5. —————. (2001). Après le colonialism : Les conséquences culturelles de la globalisation. Paris: Éditions Payot & Rivages.
  6. BHABHA, H. (2004). The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
  7. BISKIND, P. (2004). Down and Dirty Pictures: Miramax, Sundance and the Rise of Independent Film. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  8. BORDWELL, D. (2003). The Way Hollywood Tells it. Story and Style in Modern Movies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  9. ————— STAIGER, J. and THOMPSON, K. (1985). The Classical Hollywood Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.
  10. CASANOVA, P. (2013). Literature as a World. In TH. D’HAEN, C. DOMÍNGUEZ and M. ROSENDAHL THOMSEN, World Literature: A Reader (pp. 275-288). New York: Routledge.
  11. CHOMSKY, N. (2001). Universal Grammar. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
  12. DENNISON, S. and HWEE Lim, S. (2006). Situating world cinema as a theoretical problem. In S. Dennison and S. Hwee Lim, Remapping World Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.
  13. FUENTES, C. (1993). Geografía de la novela. Ciudad de México: Alfaguara.
  14. GABILONDO, J. (2009). Genealogía de la «Raza latina»: Para una teoría atlántica de las estructuras raciales hispanas. Revista Iberoamericana, LXXV (228).
  15. GARCÍA CANCLINI, N. (2005). Hybrid Cultures. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  16. GEERTZ, C. (1988). Works and Lives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  17. GENETTE, G. (1983). Narrative Discourse. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  18. GOETHE, J. W. (2013). On World Literature. In TH. D’HAEN, C. DOMÍNGUEZ and M. ROSENDAHL THOMSEN, World Literature: A Reader (pp. 9-16). New York: Routledge.
  19. GUNERATNE, A. (2003). Introduction: Rethinking Third Cinema. In: A. GUNERATNE and W. DISSANAYAKE. Rethinking Third Cinema (pp. 1-28). London and New York: Twayne Publishers.
  20. HUNTINGTON, S. (2000). Le Choc des Civilisations. París: Odile Jacob.
  21. MCCLENNEN, S. (2011). From the Aesthetics of Hunger to the Cosmetics of Hunger in Brazilian Cinema: Meirelles’ City of God. Symploke, 19 (1-2), 95-106.
  22. MARDER, M. (2013). Plant-Thinking. A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
  23. MARTIN-MÁRQUEZ, S. (2008). Disorientations: Spanish Colonialism in Africa and the Performance of Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  24. METZ, Ch. (1974). Film Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  25. MORETTI, F. (2013). Conjectures on World Literature (2000). In TH. D’HAEN, C. DOMÍNGUEZ and M. ROSENDAHL THOMSEN, World Literature: A Reader (pp. 160-175). New York: Routledge.
  26. NAFICY, H. (2001). An Accented Cinema. Exilic and Diasporic Filmmaking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  27. NAGIB, L. (2004). Talking Bullets. The Language of Violence in City of God. Third Text, 18 (3), 239-250.
  28. ————— (2006). Towards a Positive Definition of World Cinema. In S. DENNISON and S. HWEE LIM, Remapping World Cinema (pp. 30-38). New York: Columbia University Press.
  29. ————— PERRIAM, CH. and DUDRAH, R. (2012). Introduction. In: L. Nagib, Ch. Perriam and R. Dudrah. Theorizing World Cinema (pp. xvii-1). New York: I. B. Tauris & Co.
  30. ORTIZ, F. (1995). Cuban Counterpoint. Durham: Duke University Press.
  31. PASCAL, B. (s.d.). Au-delà des espaces imaginables. Bibliothèque Nationale de France. Available at http://expositions.bnf.fr/pascal/grand/bla_215.htm.
  32. POTTS, J. (1979). Is there an international film language? Sight and Sound, 48 (2).
  33. REBOLLEDO, C. (1988). Hacia la universalización de nuestra identidad: Tema de reflexión y de acción. El Nuevo Cine Latinoamericano en el Mundo de Hoy, 71 (79).
  34. RELPH, E. (1976/2008). Place and Placelessness. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
  35. SAID, E. (1994). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
  36. SHAW, D. (2007). Contemporary Latin American Cinema. Breaking into to Global Market. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  37. SHOHAT, E. and STAM, R. (2014). Unthinking Eurocentrism. Multiculturalism and the Media. New York: Routledge.
  38. SOLANAS F. and GETINO, O. (1976). Towards a Third Cinema. In B. Nichols, Movies and Methods. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  39. SPIVAK, G. (2010). Can the Subaltern Speak? In R. C. MORRIS. Reflections on the History of an Idea (pp. 36-108). New York: Columbia University Press.
  40. STEGER, M. (2008). The Rise of the Global Imaginary: Political Ideologies from the French Revolution to the Global War on Terror. New York: Oxford University Press.
  41. THANOULI, E. (2009). Post-Classical Cinema: An International Poetics of Film Narration. New York: Columbia University Press.
  42. TESHOME, G. (s.d.). Towards a Critical Theory of Third World Films. [online]. Available at: http://teshomegabriel.net/towards-a-critical-theory-of-third-world-films%5D.
  43. TIERNEY, D. (2009). Alejandor Gonzalez Iñárritu: director without border. In New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 7 (2), 101-118.
  44. VIERA, E. (2014). Cidade de Deus, Challenge to Hollywood, steps to The Constant Gardener. In D. SHAW, Contemporary Latin American Cinema. Breaking into to Global Market (pp. 51-66). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  45. WILLET, C. (2014). Interspecies Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.